000			01295cam a2200229 4500
001			ABS66081
008			021025n2002 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u120261
245			_aSt Ermins Property Co v Tingay
260			_c2002
490			_aEstates Gazette Law Reports _v[2002] 40 EG 174-177(4)
490			_aHigh Court (Administrative Court) _v[2002] EWHC 1673 (Ch)
520			_aChD 19 July 2002. The appellant tenant (T) held a lease of a flat owned by the respondent landlord (S). In October 2000, a notice was served on the landlord, under the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 s 42, claiming a new extended lease of the flat. T's son, acting under power of attorney given in 1998 signed the notice. S served a counternotice, contending that the initial notice was invalid on the ground, inter alia, that the notice was not signed in the correct form. The judge held the notice was invalid. T appealed. "Held", the appeal was dismissed.
590			_aABS
650			_aLEASEHOLD ENFRANCHISEMENT
650			_aLEASEHOLD REFORM
650			_aLEASEHOLD REFORM, HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT ACT 1993 S42
650			_aPERSONAL SIGNATURE
650			_aST ERMINS PROPERTY CO V TINGAY
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-LEASES-CASE LAW
942			_n0
999			_c71445 _d71445