| 000 | 01436cam a2200265 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS66092 | ||
| 008 | 021029n2002 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u120301 | ||
| 100 | _aEdwards, M | ||
| 245 | _aForewarned is forearmed | ||
| 260 | _c2002 | ||
| 490 |
_aSolicitors' Journal _v146(36) 27 September 2002, 858(1) |
||
| 520 | _aArgues that homebuyers should have access to comprehensive planning information before committing to a house purchase. Suggests that measures in PPG3 and PPG6 have prompted residential and commercial developers to compete for the same sites with negative consequences for homeowners. The recent cases "R v Kettering BC and English Churches Housing Group, ex p Hossack" and "R v Hammersmith and Fulham ex p Burkett" illustrate how disgruntled homeowners have challenged planning decisions on nearby land to protect their interests. Highlights the planning searches that commercial developers undertake before agreeing to development projects and argues that homebuyers should consider similar searches. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aPLANNING SYSTEM | ||
| 650 | _aPLANNING INFORMATION | ||
| 650 | _aSEARCHES | ||
| 650 | _aHOMEOWNERS | ||
| 650 | _aPPG3 | ||
| 650 | _aPLANNING POLICY GUIDANCE NOTE SIX | ||
| 650 | _aR V KETTERING BC AND ANOTHER EX P HOSSACK | ||
| 650 | _aR V HAMMERSMITH AND FULHAM LBC EX P BURKETT | ||
| 690 |
_aPlanning and development _96259 |
||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c71475 _d71475 |
||