000			01429cam a2200217 4500
001			ABS66101
008			021101n2002 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u120329
245			_aHallam Land Management Ltd v UK Coal Mining Ltd and another
260			_c2002
490			_aEstates Gazette _v[2002] 35 EG 96-104(8)
490			_aCourt of Appeal (Civil Division) _v[2002] EWCA Civ 982
520			_aCA, 30 May 2002. Appellant (H) had the benefit of an option to buy a 45 acre site from the respondent landowners (U) that was exercisable following application for the development of the property. H was granted planning permission for a development on 2.5 acres of land for company HQ with landscaping. H exercised the option to purchase the site and U contended the option was not validly exercised. The judge held that the option had not been validly exercised because H had not submitted a planning application for the development of the whole of the property, as required in the terms of the option agreement. H appealed. "Held": appeal dismissed on the grounds that the property was defined as the 45 acre site and H's application was inconsistent with that definition.
590			_aABS
650			_aOPTION AGREEMENTS
650			_aHALLAM LAND MANAGEMENT V UK COAL MINING
650			_aDEVELOPMENT LAND
650			_aPLANNING APPLICATIONS
690			_aPROPERTY AND LAND LAW-CASE LAW
942			_n0
999			_c71490 _d71490