| 000 | 01358cam a2200229 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS66048 | ||
| 008 | 021101n2002 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u120330 | ||
| 245 | _aEnvironment Agency v R Newcomb & Sons Ltd and another | ||
| 260 | _c2002 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v[2002] 43 EG 205 (CS) (26/10/02); |
||
| 490 |
_aHigh Court (Administrative Court) _v[2002] EWHC 2095 (Admin) |
||
| 520 | _aQBD, 16 October 2002. Appellant (E) brought criminal charges against respondents (R) under the Environmental Protection Act 1990 s33 for depositing controlled waste without a waste management licence. It was held that the amount of waste on each deposit was within the 5% tolerance suggested by E's letter to R, which drew attention to the Schedule 3 exemptions in the Waste Management Licensing Regulations 1994, and R was acquitted. E appealed. "Held": appeal allowed on the grounds that attention should have been paid to the contents of every skip rather than treating the exemption as applying to 95% of the total waste deposited. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aENVIRONMENT AGENCY V R NEWCOMB & SONS | ||
| 650 | _aENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ACT 1990 S33 | ||
| 650 | _aWASTE MANAGEMENT LICENSING REGULATIONS 1994 | ||
| 650 | _aWASTE DISPOSAL | ||
| 650 | _aCONTROLLED WASTE | ||
| 690 | _aENVIRONMENT-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c71491 _d71491 |
||