| 000 | 01214cam a2200229 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS66075 | ||
| 008 | 021101n2002 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u120336 | ||
| 100 | _aAllen, T | ||
| 245 | _aOccupational hazards | ||
| 260 | _c2002 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(0240) 5 October 2002, 167(1) |
||
| 520 | _aHighlights the pitfalls for tenants wishing to underlet their premises. Since the 1990s, landlords have insisted on greater preconditions on subletting such as restrictions on rent levels. Various options are open to tenants that include: applying for consent to a proposed underletting that breaches the rental requirements; applying for consent to underletting in line with the lease, but with a side arrangement ensuring that the undertenant would pay a market rent; underletting without the landlord's consent. Highlights the pros and cons of each approach but concludes that none is entirely satisfactory. | ||
| 650 | _aHOMEBASE LTD AND ANOTHER V ALLIED DUNBAR ASSURANCE PLC | ||
| 650 | _aRENT | ||
| 650 | _aSUBLETTING | ||
| 650 | _aUNDERLETTING | ||
| 650 | _aTENANTS | ||
| 650 | _aSIDE AGREEMENTS | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-BUSINESS TENANCIES | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c71496 _d71496 |
||