000			01433cam a2200277 4500
001			ABS66100
008			021101n2002 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u120338
100			_aHeppinstall, A
245			_aSquatters' rights
260			_c2002
490			_aSolicitors' Journal _v146(34) 13 September 2002, 808-809(2)
520			_aDiscusses how the Human Rights Act 1998 has affected squatters' rights and made it more difficult for owners to regain possession from unlawful occupiers. This is because the CA case "Qazi v Harrow LBC" [2001] approved the concept of 'home' within the meaning of the European Convention on Human Rights Article 8 and encouraged squatters to stand their ground. However, argues that the vast majority of cases involving squatters and possession proceedings should not be treated differently than before the Human Rights Act 1998 came into force. With an explanation of how trespassers have to satisfy the home test under Article 8. Case law.
590			_aABS
650			_aCONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND FUNDAMENTAL FREEDOMS ART 8
650			_aSQUATTERS
650			_aHUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1998
650			_aQAZI V HARROW LBC
650			_aBUCKLEY V UNITED KINGDOM
650			_aWANDSWORTH LBC V MICHALAKLAK
650			_aSHEFFIELD V SMART
650			_aPOPLAR HOUSING V DONOGHUE
650			_aMCPHAIL V DOULTON
690			_aPROPERTY
942			_n0
999			_c71498 _d71498