000			01297cam a2200217 4500
001			ABS66163
008			021118n2002 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u120487
245			_aSet the right example
260			_c2002
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(0243) 26 October 2002, 195(1)
520			_aExplains the consenquences of the decision in 'Bath and North East Somerset Council v Attorney General' which dealt with a division between the local authortiy's dealings with land in a private transaction and the dealings with the land as trustees. In this case the authority required land that was subject to a restrictive convenant that the land is only used for public recreation. High court decided that in this instance the council wastrustee of the land and would have to comply with charity law if it wished to dispose of the whole or any part of the ground. This case should stand as guidance to other authorities facing the same situation.
590			_aABS
650			_aBATH AND NORTH EAST SOMERSET DC V ATTORNEY GENERAL
650			_aDISPOSAL OF LAND
650			_aLOCAL AUTHORITY LAND
650			_aPROPERTY-PROPERTY ACQUISITION AND DISPOSAL-ACQUISITION AND DISPOSAL BY PRIVATE TREATY
650			_aRESTRICTIVE COVENANT
690			_aLOCAL GOVERNMENT
942			_n0
999			_c71575 _d71575