| 000 | 01230cam a2200217 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB3843-10 | ||
| 008 | 021121n2002 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u120539 | ||
| 245 | _aNot a dog's chance | ||
| 260 | _c2002 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(0246) 16 November 2002, 195 (1) |
||
| 520 | _aConsiders the legal issues regarding leasehold property let for mixed purposes - business and residential - and whether the tenancy is governed by the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 Part II (the business code) or by one of the residential statutory codes. The principle that a unilateral cessation of the business use cannot take the tenancy into the residential code has been upheld in a number of CA decisions. Discusses "Tomkins v Basildon DC" [2002] in which a tenant was deemed to have become a secure tenant on the basis that the original lease had been varied only as to use and not been surrendered, a decision overturned however on appeal. | ||
| 590 | _aWB | ||
| 650 | _aMIXED-USE TENANCIES | ||
| 650 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1954 PART II | ||
| 650 | _aTOMKINS V BASILDON DC | ||
| 650 | _aPROPERTY-LEASEHOLD PROPERTY | ||
| 650 | _aRENT ACT 1965 | ||
| 690 | _aPROPERTY-LANDLORD AND TENANT | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c71614 _d71614 |
||