000			01537cam a2200241 4500
001			ABS66169
008			021129n2002 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u120620
245			_aR (on the application of Hammerton) v London Underground Ltd and others
260			_c2002
490			_aEstates Gazette _v[2002] 47 EG 148 (CS) (23/11/02)
490			_aJournal of Planning and Environment Law _v[2003] JPL 984-1029(46)
520			_a[2002] EWHC 2307 (Admin), 8 November 2002. London Underground Ltd (LUL) was in breach of planning control when construction commenced on the East London Line extension. LUL refused to make an undertaking, sought by the claimant (H), not to demolish Bishopsgate Goods Yard, a listed building. The question was whether the goods yard comprised of one building or several and if so, did the listing cover all of them. H applied for permission to bring about a judicial review proceedings to challenge LULs decision not to make an undertaking. It was decided that it was a matter for the local planning authorities to determine what, if any, enforcement action was appropriate. Held: the claim was allowed in part.
590			_aABS
650			_aR V LONDON UNDERGROUND LTD AND OTHERS EX P HAMMERTON
650			_aTIME LIMITS
650			_aPLANNING PERMISSION
650			_aBREACH OF CONDITION NOTICES
650			_aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 S56
650			_aPLANNING (LISTED BUILDINGS AND CONSERVATION AREAS) ACT 1990
690			_aPlanning and development _96259
942			_n0
999			_c71675 _d71675