000			01523cam a2200229 4500
001			ABS66172
008			021202n2002 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u120637
245			_aP and S Platt Ltd v Crouch and another
260			_c2002
490			_aEstates Gazette Case Summaries _v[2002] 45 EG 154 (CS)
520			_aChD 25 October 2002. Defendants (C) owned and operated an 18-bedroom hotel which offered river moorings for hotel guests. C sold the hotel as a going concern to claimant (P) for £700 000 and a further agreement was entered into whereby P obtained a option to buy the property belonging to the defendants for a further £200 000. The sale agreement and the subsequent conveyance of the hotel did not mention the mooring facility. P brought proceedings after C refused to allow hotel guests to use the river moorings and footbridge. P argued such use had been acquired by way of a grant to be implied by s62 of the Law of Property Act 1925. The claim was allowed as it was stated that a right to moor boats to a mooring post and the right to place a notice or sign were establised categories of easement. View judgment at www.bailii.org.
590			_aABS
650			_aREAL PROPERTY
650			_aEASEMENTS
650			_aTRANSFERS
650			_aLAW OF PROPERTY ACT 1925
650			_aP AND S PLATT LTD V CROUCH
690			_aPROPERTY AND LAND LAW-CASE LAW
856			_uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Ch/2002/2195.html _zView judgment on the BAILLI website...
942			_n0
999			_c71686 _d71686