| 000 | 01211cam a2200229 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS66161 | ||
| 008 | 021204n2002 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u120662 | ||
| 100 | _aHendershott, P. | ||
| 245 | 2 | _aA comparison of upward-only and turnover leases | |
| 260 | _c2002 | ||
| 490 |
_aJournal of Property Investment and Finance _v20(6) 2002, 513-524(12) |
||
| 520 | _aThe upward only lease is the dominant rental contract in the UK, while the turnover lease is widely used in the US retail sector. This paper compares and contrasts the landlord rent options in these two leases, interpreting and extending the earlier simulation analysis of Booth and Walsh and of Hendershott and Ward. While the options are similar, the ability of the turnover rent lease to induce greater landlord effort and co-operation between tenants and the landlord suggest that both UK investors and UK consumers would be well served by greater use of the turnover lease. [Taken from journal abstract]. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aLEASES | ||
| 650 | _aOPTIONS | ||
| 650 | _aTURNOVER LEASES | ||
| 650 | _aRENT | ||
| 650 | _aUPWARD ONLY RENT REVIEWS | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-LEASES | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c71706 _d71706 |
||