| 000 | 01221cam a2200253 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS66280 | ||
| 008 | 021211n2002 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u120736 | ||
| 100 | _aEdwards, Martin | ||
| 245 | 4 | _aThe best laid plans | |
| 260 | _c2002 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(0245) 9 November 2002, 151(1) |
||
| 520 | _aWarns that three recent HL decisions may mean developers should be wary of third-party challenges, particularly those coming from local amenity groups and individuals. Governments' planning green paper appeared to emphasise developer/planning authority relationship, but pressure groups have recently begun to bring effective challenges to planning decisions. Concludes planning lawyers must understand public law principles and their effect on decisions. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aR V SOS ENVIRONMENT EX P KENT CC | ||
| 650 | _aR V REPROTECH (PEBSHAM) LTD EX P EAST SUSSEX CC | ||
| 650 | _aR V HAMMERSMITH AND FULHAM LBC EX P BURKETT | ||
| 650 | _aR V SOUTH CAMBRIDGESHIRE DC EX P KIDES | ||
| 650 | _aCOGHURST WOOD LEISURE LTD V SOS LOCAL GOVERNMENT | ||
| 650 | _aTHIRD PARTIES | ||
| 690 |
_aPlanning and development _96259 |
||
| 700 | _aMartin, J | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c71747 _d71747 |
||