| 000 | 01450cam a2200229 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS66278 | ||
| 008 | 021218n2002 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u120823 | ||
| 100 | _aBrewer, G | ||
| 245 | _aMeasure of damages | ||
| 260 | _c2002 | ||
| 490 |
_aContract Journal _v416(6403) 13 November 2002, 40(1) |
||
| 520 | _aLooks at the issue of the measure of damages as a proportion of the benefits obtained by the defendant. In "Amec Developments Ltd v Jurys Hotel Management (UK) Ltd" [2000] Amec claimed it was entitled to damages to reflect the sum of money it might reasonably have been able to demand from Jury's Hotel as a deal for allowing encroachment beyond a permitted building line. The court assessed damages at £375 000 after it judged that the defendant had encroached a building line, protected by a restrictive covenant, by a substantial amount, representing a significant area of extra building space. The implication of this judgment is that, in certain circumstances, damages will be assessed on the basis of the gain obtained by the party in breach of duty, even where no loss is suffered by the other party. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aAMEC DEVELOPMENTS LTD V JURY'S HOTEL MANAGEMENT (UK) LTD | ||
| 650 | _aDAMAGES | ||
| 650 | _aMEASURE OF DAMAGES | ||
| 650 | _aRESTRICTIVE COVENANTS | ||
| 650 | _aBUILDING LINE | ||
| 690 | _aENVIRONMENTAL AND LAND CONSULTANCY-PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c71803 _d71803 |
||