000			01321cam a2200241 4500
001			ABS66243
008			030107n2002 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u120932
100			_aCheung, S-O
245		2	_aA multi-attribute utility model for dispute resolution strategy selection
260			_c2002
490			_aConstruction Management and Economics _v20(7) October 2002, 557-568(12)
520			_aConsiders the systematic determination of which dispute resolution strategy to adopt for a given dispute and the paucity of research in this field. Examines a decision-making model using the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and multi-attribute utility technique (MAUT). The model comprises four parts: selection criteria, dispute resolution strategies, collection of utility factors and selection criteria weightings. The model was developed from data collected from experts using an interview survey and is tested using a hypothetical scenario and case studies. Tables and references [Taken from journal abstract].
590			_aABS
650			_aCONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
650			_aANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS
650			_aMULTI-ATTRIBUTE UTILITY TECHNIQUE
650			_aSELECTION CRITERIA
650			_aHONG KONG
690			_aDispute resolution _96236
700			_aSUEN, H.C.H.
942			_n0
999			_c71885 _d71885