| 000 | 01762cam a2200241 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS66375 | ||
| 008 | 030120n2003 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u121070 | ||
| 245 | _aR v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p Burkett | ||
| 260 | _c2003 | ||
| 490 |
_aProperty, Planning and Compensation Reports _v[2003] 1 P&CR 20-40(21) |
||
| 520 | _a[2002] UKHL 23, 23 May 2002. On 15 September 1999 the defendant planning authority (H) resolved to grant planning permission for a 32 acre mixed-use development adjoining the claimant's (B) house. On 6 April 2000 B submitted an application for permission to apply for a judicial review of that decision, alleging failures in the Environmental Impact Assessment. On 12 May 2000 planning permission was granted. B's application for judicial review was dismissed by the CA ([2001] Env LR 684) on the grounds that it had not been made within the three month time limit, set to run from the date of the resolution. B was granted leave to appeal to HL. "Held": HL allowed appeal on the grounds that the three-month period in which to make an application for judicial review runs from the date that planning permission is granted, not from the date of the resolution. View judgment at www.parliament.uk/. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aR V HAMMERSMITH AND FULHAM LBC EX P BURKETT | ||
| 650 | _aPLANNING PERMISSION | ||
| 650 | _aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING | ||
| 650 | _aMIXED-USE DEVELOPMENTS | ||
| 650 | _aPLANNING OBJECTIONS | ||
| 650 | _aTIME LIMITS | ||
| 690 | _aENVIRONMENTAL AND LAND CONSULTANCY-PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT | ||
| 856 |
_uhttps://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/ld200102/ldjudgmt/jd020523/burket-1.htm _zView the judgment on the House of Lords website. |
||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c71939 _d71939 |
||