000			01434cam a2200253 4500
001			ABS66328
008			030122n2003 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u121091
245			_aManchester City Council v Railtrack
260			_c2003
490			_aEstates Gazette Case Summaries _v[2003] 01 EG 66 (CS)
520			_aQBD 11 December 2002. Appeal by the council (M) against the respondent (R) alleging that it had breached Building Regulations 2000 Reg12(2)(B) by extending retail areas at Manchester's Piccadilly railway station without obtaining building regulations approval as required by regulation 14. The magistrates found that R's activities fell within the statutory exemption contained in the Building Act 1984 s4(1)(b), which relieves statutory undertakers of the duty to submit plans for approval in relation to buildings used by them for the purpose of their undertaking, unless it is used as offices and not part of a railway station. M appealed. "Held", the appeal was dismissed.
590			_aABS
650			_aBUILDING REGULATIONS _96224
650			_aSTATUTORY UNDERTAKERS
650			_aMANCHESTER CITY COUNCIL V RAILTRACK PLC
650			_aBUILDING ACT 1984 S4(1)(B)
650			_aBUILDING REGULATIONS 2000 REG 12(2)(B)
650			_aRAILWAY STATIONS
650			_aEXEMPTION
650			_aLOCAL PLANNING
690			_aBUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION-REGULATION AND CONTROL-CASE LAW
942			_n0
999			_c71952 _d71952