000			01521cam a2200241 4500
001			ABS66376
008			030122n2003 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u121096
100			_aHarnett, M.
245		4	_aThe perils of jumping the gun
260			_c2003
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(0303) 18 January 2003, 117(1)
520			_aExamines the implications of "Henry Boot Homes v Bassettlaw DC" (CA Abs66279) for developers, planning authorities and landlords. Confirmed that developers who begin development before planning consent pre-conditions are met will risk losing their consent. Compliance with the conditions can be avoided by making a formal application under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 s73, but this can only be done where the original consent is still alive. Points out the risk of enforcement action for owners of developments completed less than four years ago, and highlights the problems for planning authorities if consent has not been implemented and the development becomes immune from enforcement. This could give landowners unrestricted consent with the option to remarket the site. Judgment available atwww.courtservice.gov.uk.
590			_aABS
650			_aHENRY BOOT HOMES LTD V BASSETLAW DC
650			_aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 S73
650			_aPLANNING CONSENT
650			_aPLANNING CONDITIONS
650			_aDEVELOPERS
650			_aENFORCEMENT ACTION
690			_aENVIRONMENTAL AND LAND CONSULTANCY-PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
942			_n0
999			_c71956 _d71956