000			01498cam a2200289 4500
001			ABS66380
008			030129n2003 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u121158
245			_aRaja v Austin Gray
260			_c2003
490			_aEstates Gazette _v[2003] 04 EG 151 (CS) (1)
490			_aEstates Gazette _v[2003] 13 EG 117-124(8)
520			_a[2002] EWCA Civ 1965 19 December 2002. The respondent (R) owned properties that he had charged to a third party as security on loans. The third party went into receivership and exercised a power of sale over R's properties.The receivers appointed the appellant AG to value the properties. The first issue was whether the receivers owed a duty of care in equity to the deceased (R) in relation to the valuations of the properties. If not the case, then AG did not owe a duty of care to R. The second issue was whether AG owed a duty of care to any party other than the receivers as their clients. CA held that it was not just, fair and reasonable to treat AG as owing a duty of care directly to T. Appeal allowed (for HC judgment see X119613).
590			_aABS
650			_aRAJA V AUSTIN GRAY
650			_aNEGLIGENT VALUATION
650			_aVALUATIONS
650			_aEQUITY OF REDEMPTION
650			_aMORTGAGES
650			_aDUTIES
650			_aFORESEEABILITY
650			_aUNDERVALUE
650			_aDUTY OF CARE
650			_aREASONABLE
690			_aMANAGEMENT-BUSINESS MANAGEMENT-PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE
942			_n0
999			_c71990 _d71990