000			01880cam a2200265 4500
001			ABS66319
008			030205n2003 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u121245
100			_aBingham, T.
245			_aFreezing points
260			_c2003
490			_aBuilding _v268 (8265) 24 January 2003, 47(1)
490			_aContract Journal _v417(6415) 26 February 2003, 27(1)
490			_aConstruction Industry Law Letter _v March 2003, 1949-1951(3)
520			_aConsiders the important issues raised in "Baldwins Industrial Services v Barr Ltd". Baldwins called in the adjudicator when Barr refused to pay £150 000 to repair a jiggered crane. Baldwins went into receivership just before enforcement proceedings were heard. Discusses the scope a court has to order an adjudicator's award to a firm in financial difficulties to be paid into court. This is the first case where a court has pronounced on whether a plant-hire contract is a construction contract, as defined in the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneartion Act 1996. Also considers the willingness of judges to order that money be paid into court so defeating the adjudicator's decision. The case is going to CA. View judgment at www.bailli.org.
590			_aABS
650			_aBALDWINS INDUSTRIAL SERVICES PLC V BARR LTD
650			_aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION-ADJUDICATORS
650			_aHOUSING GRANTS, CONSTRUCTION AND REGENERATION ACT 1996
650			_aHOUSING GRANTS, CONSTRUCTION AND REGENERATION ACT 1996 S105
650			_aCONSTRUCTION DISPUTES
650			_aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION-ADJUDICATION AWARDS
690			_aBUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION-CASE LAW
942			_n0
999			_c72057 _d72057