000			01510cam a2200265 4500
001			ABS66387
008			030205n2002 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u121247
100			_aBaines, A.
245			_aCompensation for purchasers for undetected planning restrictions
260			_c2002
490			_aJournal of Planning and Environment Law _vDecember 2002, 1440-1443(4)
520			_aExamines the issue of compensation payable to purchasers for an undetected agricultural restriction with reference to "Smith v South Gloucestershire DC" (CA Abs65982). The defendant council was deemed liable to pay compensation to Smith under the Local Land Charges Act 1970 s10 for failing to register an agricultural occupancy restriction. Smith was awarded £292 500 compensation (hearing date valuation) rather than £197 500 (discovery date valuation). In the light of "Smith", considers the circumstance in which local authorities will be liable for omissions to the local land charges register and looks at the effect that the judgment may have on professional negligence claims generally. Case law.
590			_aABS
650			_aALCOA MINERALS OF JAMAICA V BRODERICK
650			_aLOCAL LAND CHARGES
650			_aPROFESSIONAL NEGLIGENCE
650			_aLOCAL LAND CHARGES ACT 1975 S10
650			_aCOMPENSATION
650			_aAGRICULTURAL OCCUPANCY RESTRICTIONS
650			_aPLANNING RESTRICTIONS
650			_aVALUATION DATE
690			_aPROPERTY AND LAND LAW-CASE LAW
942			_n0
999			_c72059 _d72059