000			01910cam a2200301 4500
001			ABS66424
008			030224n2003 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u121414
100			_aFranklin, K.
245			_aAdjudicator's jurisdiction: a case of no contract, no dispute
260			_c2003
490			_aArchitects' Journal _v217(6) 13 February 2003, 40(1)
520			_aConsiders "Carillion Construction v Devonport Royal Dockyard" (2002). Carillion (C) relied upon an oral agreement varying the terms of the written contract but, following the CA ruling that all the terms and not just the existence of a contract should be evident in writing in "RJT Consulting Engineering Ltd v DM Engineering (NI) Ltd" (CA X118297) (see also Abs66002, Abs65216, Abs65501and Abs64362), it was held that this did not form a contract in writing under Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996 s107. It was also ruled that there was no dispute to refer to adjudication as C failed to provide the clarification of its claim requested by the defendant's management company.
590			_aABS
650			_a-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION-ADJUDICATORS-ADJUDICATORS' JURISDICTION
650			_aCARILLION CONSTRUCTION LTD V DEVONPORT ROYAL DOCKYARD LTD
650			_aCONSTRUCTION DISPUTES
650			_aCONTRACTS IN WRITING
650			_aELLERINE V KLINGER
650			_aR J T CONSULTING ENGINEERS LTD V D M ENGINEERING (NI) LTD
650			_aGROVEDECK LTD V CAPITAL DEMOLITION LTD
650			_aHOUSING GRANTS, CONSTRUCTION AND REGENERATION ACT 1996 S107
650			_aNO CONTRACTS IN WRITING
650			_aORAL CONTRACTS
650			_aTRADAX INTERNATIONAL V CERRAHOQULLARI
690			_aMANGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION
942			_n0
999			_c72145 _d72145