000			01527cam a2200253 4500
001			ABS66452
008			030303n2003 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u121471
245			_aGo West Ltd v Spigarolo and another
260			_c2003
490			_aEstates Gazette Case Summaries _v[2003] 7 EG 136 (CS) (1)
490			_aWeekly Law Reports _v[2003] 2 986-1006(20)
520			_a[2003] EWCA Civ 17, 31 January 2003. The appellant (G) was the tenant and the respondents (S) were the landlords of premises in London. The lease contained a clause not to assign without the landlords' written consent which should not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. G wished to assign and sought S's consent in March 2001. S refused. In July 2001 G brought proceedings for a declaration that consent was unreasonably withheld. Judgment was in favour of the landlords. The judge found that both parties had treated the tenant's request for consent as continuing and took the view that no breach of duty had taken place as of July 2001. Both parties appealed. CA held that S was in statutory breach in refusing to give consent to assign. G's appeal allowed. S's cross-appeal allowed.
590			_aABS
650			_aCONSENT TO ASSIGN
650			_aCOMMERCIAL LEASES
650			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1988 S1(3)
650			_aESTOPPEL
650			_aWITHHOLDING CONSENT
650			_aGO WEST LTD V SPIGAROLO AND ANOTHER
650			_aREASONABLE TIME
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-LEASES-CASE LAW
942			_n0
999			_c72188 _d72188