000			01416cab a2200265 4500
001			ABS54611
008			090401t1996 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u11342
041			_aeng
245			_aHodkinson v Humphreys-Jones (VO)
260			_c1996
350			_a0
490			_aRating Appeals _v(1996) RA 69-86(18)
520			_aLT 1 December 1995. The appellant owned a property that was listed for rating purposes as `boarding house - part`, between April 1990 and March 1992. He contended that the property was domestic because from April 1990 to March 1991 it was his intention that it be available for short-stay accommodation only, and from April 1991 to March 1992 it was his intention that short-stay accommodation be for no more than six people simultaneously (all in accordance with the then legislation), and that he had sole or main residence. "Held" property was non-domestic for first period and domestic for second. Whilst appellant unable to prove his intentions in the first instance, the balance of probabilities suggested that he could in the second.
650			_a100-DAY RULE
650			_aBOARDING HOUSES
650			_aHODKINSON V HUMPHREYS-JONES (VO)
650			_aNON-DOMESTIC RATING
650			_aRATING APPEALS
650			_aSHORT STAY ACCOMMODATION
650			_aSIX PERSON RULE
690			_aRATING AND VALUATION-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c7220 _d7220