000			01847cam a2200265 4500
001			ABS66486
008			030305n2003 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u121531
245			_aArcher Ltd v Richard Henry Robinson
260			_c2003
490			_aRating Appeals _v[2003] RA 1-20(11)
520			_aRA/19/2002, 6 January 2003. The assessment of a factory and premises was determined by a valuation tribunal at £32 000 rateable value in the 1995 rating list. A appealed and wanted the sum to be reduced to £8 000. In 1992 A took a five-year lease on the property on full repairing and insuring terms. Within the terms of the lease, the landlord would carry out specified works, including replacing the existing roof lights. After the ratepayer had moved in it was discovered that the new lights had not been correctly installed. The key issue was the effect of the fact that at the material day the roof was cracked and leaking. The secondary issues that arose were whether the repairing works constituted repairs and if so, whether a reasonable landlord would have deemed them uneconomic. "Held", the appeal property was to be valued on the assumption that, before the hypothetical tenancy began, it had been repaired by way of over-roofing.
590			_aABS
650			_aANNUAL VALUE
650			_aROOFING
650			_aLOCAL GOVERNMENT FINANCE ACT 1988
650			_aRATING (VALUATION) ACT 1999
650			_aLEAKS
650			_aARCHER LTD V ROBINSON (VO)
650			_aHYPOTHETICAL LANDLORDS
650			_aREPAIRS
690			_aPROPERTY-PROPERTY APPRAISAL AND VALUATION
856			_uhttps://www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/markup.cgi?doc=/ew/cases/EWLands/2003/RA_19_2002.html&query=Archer+and+Ltd+and+v+and+Richard+and+Henry+and+Robinson&method=boolean _zView the judgment free of charge at www.bailii.org
942			_n0
999			_c72234 _d72234