| 000 | 00987cam a2200229 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS6644 | ||
| 008 | 030307n2003 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u121578 | ||
| 100 | _aJansen, M. | ||
| 245 | _aFew winners in the Homebase crusade | ||
| 260 | _c2003 | ||
| 490 |
_aProperty Week _v68(3) 24 January 2003, 34-35(2) |
||
| 520 | _aDiscusses the case "Homebase Ltd and another v Allied Dunbar Assurance plc" (CA Abs65740) over a disputed subletting. Homebase was proved unsuccessful in its attempt to prove that Allied Dunbar had unreasonably withheld consent to the subletting of a retail warehouse in Wolverhampton. The author states that the case reinforced the notion that lease terms rule. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aLEASE TERMS | ||
| 650 | _aSUBLETTING | ||
| 650 | _aRETAIL WAREHOUSES | ||
| 650 | _aSIDE AGREEMENTS | ||
| 650 | _aHOMEBASE LTD AND ANOTHER V ALLIED DUNBAR ASSURANCE PLC | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-BUSINESS TENANCIES | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c72271 _d72271 |
||