000			01369cam a2200289 4500
001			ABS66423
008			030307n2003 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u121580
100			_aAwadalla, K.
245		4	_aThe privileged few: practitioners and litigants must take ADR and the CPR into account before using without prejudice privilege, or face costs
260			_c2003
490			_aSolicitors' Journal _v147(2) 17 January 2003, 43-44(2)
520			_aThe principle of without prejudice privilege (WPP) is difficult to apply. Errors are often made when it is used inappropriately or where 'privileged' correspondence is wrongly excluded from evidence. Mistakes can be avoided by considering the background and rationale of the privilege and its exceptions and function in litigation. Case law.
590			_aABS
650			_aCIVIL LITIGATION
650			_aDISPUTE RESOLUTION _96236
650			_aWITHOUT PREJUDICE PRIVILEGE
650			_aWITHOUT PREJUDICE
650			_aRUSH AND TOMPKINS LTD V GREATER LONDON COUNCIL AND ANOTHER
650			_aPRUDENTIAL ASSURANCE CO LTD V PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE CO OF AMERICA
650			_aUNILEVER PLC V PROCTOR AND GAMBLE CO
650			_aSOMATRA V SINCLAIR ROCHE AND TEMPLEY
650			_aDUNNETT V RAILTRACK PLC
650			_aCIVIL PROCEDURE RULES
690			_aDispute resolution _96236
942			_n0
999			_c72273 _d72273