000			01613cam a2200289 4500
008			030311n2003 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u121590
100			_aChapman, V.
245			_aNot in my back yard!: was there recent restrictive covenants on land case a victory?
260			_c2003
490			_aSolicitors' Journal _v147(2) 17 January 2003, 48-49(2)
520			_aDiscusses "Crest Nicholson Residential (South) Ltd v McAllister" (ChD Abs66116) where two restrictive covenants threatened land development. The first covenant restricted land use for the purpose of a private dwellinghouse for a single house or for private residential use. The second covenant restricted building on land unless plans were approved by a named person were absolute or spent if the person died. The judge upheld the "prima facie" meaning of the covenant restricting use to a private dwellinghouse whilst recognising that the second covenant prohibiting building had been spent upon dissolution of the company. "Crest" is likely to be used as a precedent when similar restrictive covenants are considered in the future.
590			_aABS
650			_aCREST NICHOLSON RESIDENTIAL (SOUTH) LTD V MCALLISTER
650			_aCOVENANTS
650			_aDEVELOPMENT LAND
650			_aDWELLINGHOUSES
650			_aDOBBS V LINFORD
650			_aDOWNIE V TURNER
650			_aBRIGGS V MCCUSKER
650			_aRE BEECHWOOD HOMES LTDS APPLICATION 1994
650			_aBELL V NORMAN C ASHTON LTD
650			_aLAW OF PROPERTY ACT 1925 S61
650			_aRESTRICTIVE COVENANTS
690			_aPROPERTY
942			_n0
999			_c72280 _d72280