000			01903cam a2200289 4500
001			ABS66513
008			030321n2003 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u121707
100			_aBrewer, G.
245		4	_aThe meaning of dispute
260			_c2003
490			_aContract Journal _v417(6417) 12 March 2003, 23(1)
490			_aConstruction News _v (6826) 24 July 2003, 28(1)
520			_aThe Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996 s108(1) allows any party to a construction contract to refer a dispute arising under the contract to adjudication. The article discusses a number of leading cases which aim to establish what constitutes a disputes including "Cowlin Construction v CFW Architects" [2002] EWHC 2914 (TCC), "Fastrack Contractors v Morrison Construction" (QBD [2001] 75 Con LR 33), "Sindall Ltd v Solland" (QBD [2002] 80 Con LR 152) "Edmund Nuttall v R G Carter" (TCC Abs65503) and "Halki Shipping Corporation v Sopex Oils"(CA X91568, X88910). Concludes that the referring party in adjudication should ensure that matters raised with the opposing party should be given appropriate time for consideration before referring them to adjudication.
590			_aABS
650			_aCOWLIN CONSTRUCTION LTD V C F W ARCHITECTS
650			_aDISPUTE
650			_aHOUSING GRANTS CONSTRUCTION AND REGENERATION ACT 1996 S108(1)
650			_aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION
650			_aCRUDEN CONSTRUCTION LTD V NEW TOWNS COMMISSION
650			_aFASTRACK CONTRACTORS V MORRISON CONSTRUCTION
650			_aSINDALL LTD V SOLLAND
650			_aEDMUND NUTTALL LTD V R G CARTER LTD
650			_aHALKI SHIPPING CORPORATION V SOPEX OILS LTD
690			_aMANGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION
942			_n0
999			_c72329 _d72329