| 000 | 01199cam a2200253 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS66564 | ||
| 008 | 030401n2003 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u121849 | ||
| 100 | _aMurdoch, J. | ||
| 245 | _aValue with hindsight | ||
| 260 | _c2003 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(0312) 22 March 2003, 126(1) |
||
| 490 |
_aArchitects' Journal _v217(19) 15 May 2003, 50(1) |
||
| 520 | _aDiscusses two approaches which have been taken by the courts when considering purchasers' damages for negligent surveys. The 'difference in value' approach based on the difference between the price paid in reliance upon the report and true value as illustrated in "Watts v Morrow" (CA [1991] CILL 687) is open to dispute and a degree of ambiguity. "Mckinnon v E Survey" (ChD Abs66390) takes the 'true value' approach assessing the value of the property in its defective state with the benefit of hindsight. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aNEGLIGENT SURVEYS | ||
| 650 |
_aValuation _96273 |
||
| 650 | _aDIFFERENCE IN VALUE | ||
| 650 | _aDAMAGES | ||
| 650 | _aWATTS V MORROW | ||
| 650 | _aMCKINNON AND ANOTHER V E.SURV LTD | ||
| 690 | _aPROPERTY-PROPERTY APPRAISAL AND VALUATION | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c72407 _d72407 |
||