| 000 | 01419cam a2200241 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS66535 | ||
| 008 | 030402n2003 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u121866 | ||
| 100 | _aVivian, J. | ||
| 245 | _aBreaking all the rules | ||
| 260 | _c2003 | ||
| 490 |
_aProperty Week _v68(7) 21 February 2003, 32-33(2) |
||
| 520 | _aRaises a number of important issues concerning the application of break clauses in leases. Advises landlords to ensure that all conditions in a lease have been complied with, "Commercial Union Life Assurance Co v Label Ink" (ChD unreported) provides guidance on what is 'material' for the purpose of break clauses and emphasises the importance of responding promptly to the serving of notices. Reminds tenants of the importance of the timing of notices, explains when a break clause is not a break and looks at vacant possession. Concludes with a discussion of "Go West Ltd v Spigarolo and another" (CA Abs66452) concerning the unreasonable refusal of consent for the assignment of a lease by a landlord. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aBREAK CLAUSES | ||
| 650 | _aSERVING NOTICES | ||
| 650 | _aCODE FOR LEASING BUSINESS PREMISES IN ENGLAND AND WALES | ||
| 650 | _aGO WEST LTD V SPIGAROLO AND ANOTHER | ||
| 650 | _aCOMMERCIAL UNION LIFE ASSURANCE CO LTD V LABEL INK LTD | ||
| 650 | _aCOMMERCIAL LEASES | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-BUSINESS TENANCIES | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c72421 _d72421 |
||