000 02229cam a2200241 4500
001 ABS66539
008 030403n2003 000 0 eng u
035 _a(Sirsi) u121889
245 _aR v London Rent Assessment Committee ex p Lester
260 _c2003
490 _aWeekly Law Reports
_v[2003] 1 WLR 1449-1460(13)
520 _a[2003] EWCA Civil 319, 12 March 2003. Appeal by the tenant (L) from (QBD [2003] 10 EG 168). L's landlord served her with a notice under the Housing Act 1988 s13(2) proposing a rent increase. L, using the prescribed form 5, referred the notice to the respondent London Rent Assessment Committee (LRAC). LRAC was of the view that it could not determine L's application, following s13(4) of the 1988 Act stipulating that any referral had to be made before the date upon which the proposed rent was due to take effect. L brought proceedings in which she contended that the application had been referred to LRAC on the day upon which it was sent or when it would have arrived in the ordinary course of the post. L's claim was dismissed on the basis that 'refer' in s13(4) meant 'deliver to'. L appealed, relying upon the wording of the guidance notes attached to form 5 in support of her construction of s13(4) and arguing further that the judge's interpretation infringed her right to a fair hearing under the European Convention on Human Rights Art 6. "Held" appeal dismissed. The ordinary meaning of 'refer to' connoted 'receipt by', the meaning attributed to it in the 1988 Act s13(4), not the meaning of the wording in the guidance notes. Such notes could not be used as an aid to construction of the primary legislation. Nor did construing s13(4) as 'receipt' rather than 'despatch' infringe Art 6 of the Convention and thus L's civil rights.
590 _aABS
650 _aCONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND FUNDAMENTAL FREEDOMS ART 6
650 _aRENT ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE
650 _aNASH V RYAN PLANT INTERNATIONAL LTD
650 _aJACKSON V HALL
650 _aHOUSING ACT 1988 S13(4)
650 _aHOUSING ACT 1988 S13(2)
650 _aR V LONDON RENT ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE EX P LESTER
690 _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-RENT REVIEWS-CASE LAW
942 _n0
999 _c72441
_d72441