| 000 | 01160cam a2200241 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | X121903 | ||
| 008 | 030404n2003 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u121903 | ||
| 100 | _aMurdoch, S. | ||
| 245 | _aSweetshop revenge | ||
| 260 | _c2003 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(0304) 25 January 2003, 150(1) |
||
| 520 | _aIn the commercial sector, a landlord usually retains an interest in the property and will enforce any obligations. Discusses the issue if a landlord is unwilling to intervene, whether a tenant can take steps to enforce lease covenants against another. Examines the case "Williams and another v Kiley (t/a CK Supermarkets Ltd) (2002)" where the CA upheld the rights of shopkeeper tenants to enforce user covenants against a fellow tenant when the landlord failed to intervene. | ||
| 650 | _aWILLIAMS AND ANOTHER V KILEY (T/A CK SUPERMARKETS LTD) | ||
| 650 | _aRESTRICTIVE COVENANTS | ||
| 650 | _aLEASEHOLD COVENANTS | ||
| 650 | _aUSER COVENANTS | ||
| 650 | _aSHOPKEEPERS | ||
| 650 | _aCONTRACTS (RIGHTS OF THIRD PARTIES) ACT 1999 | ||
| 650 | _aCOMMERCIAL TENANTS | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-LEASES | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c72449 _d72449 |
||