000			01466cam a2200205 4500
001			X121904
008			030404n2003 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u121904
100			_aLong, P.
245			_aExclusion and limitation clauses: latest developments
260			_c2003
490			_aConstruction Law Bulletin _v March 2003, 5-7(3)
520			_aLooks at points of exclusion and limitation clauses applicable to construction contracts, which were highlighted by "SAM Business Systems Limited v Hedley and Company" (TCC [2002] All ER (D) 311 Dec), a dispute which arose between a software supplier and its dissatisfied customer. Judge held that "SAM "could not claim sums for work done in order to remedy its own breaches of agreement and also failed "Hedley " counterclaim that their only remedy lay in rejecting the software under the acceptance procedures. Construction contracts are not usually concluded on the standard terms of business of one party, but they may contain exclusion clauses, especially relating to the supply and installation of plant. View judgment at www.bailii.org.
650			_aEXCLUSION CLAUSES
650			_aSAM BUSINESS SYSTEMS LTD V HEDLEY AND COMPANY
650			_aLIMITATION CLAUSES
690			_aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT FORMS
856			_uhttps://www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/markup.cgi?doc=/ew/cases/EWHC/TCC/2002/2733.html&query="Sam Business Systems" _zView judgment at Bailii website.
942			_n0
999			_c72450 _d72450