000			01904cam a2200253 4500
001			ABS66624
008			030410n2003 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u121960
245			_aBellway Urban Renewal Southern v Gillespie
260			_c2003
490			_aEstates Gazette Case Summaries _v[2003] 14 EG 123 (CS) (1)
490			_aJournal of Planning and Environment Law _v[2003] JPL 1287-1309(23)
520			_a[2003] EWCA Civ 400, 27 March 2003. Appeal by B against the judge's decision to quash planning permission granted by the SoS for a residential development on a contaminated former gasworks site. The SoS decided an environmental impact assessment (EIA) was not necessary because proposed remediation measures would prevent significant environmental effects. When respondent G appealed the judge quashed the permission on the basis that an EIA was required before planning permission was granted. B appealed. "Held": appeal dismissed. The SoS had erred in assuming that proposed remediation measures provided a complete solution to the question of whether environmental effects were likely. For High Court decision, "Gillespie v SoS Environment and another" see Abs66546. View judgment at www.courtservice.gov.uk.
590			_aABS
650			_aENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENTS
650			_aREMEDIATION TREATMENTS
650			_aBELLWAY URBAN RENEWAL SOUTHERN V GILLESPIE
650			_aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING (ASSESSMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS) REGULATIONS 1988
650			_aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990
650			_aENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS
690			_aENVIRONMENTAL AND LAND CONSULTANCY-PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
856			_uhttps://www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/markup.cgi?doc=/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2003/400.html&query=Bellway+and+Urban+and+Renewal+and+Southern+and+v+and+Gillespie&method=boolean _zView the judgment free of charge at www.bailii.org
942			_n0
999			_c72484 _d72484