000			01418cam a2200253 4500
001			ABS66625
008			030415n2003 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u121999
100			_aEdwards, M.
245			_aPlanning's trojan horse
260			_c2003
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(0315) 12 April 2003, 135(1)
520			_aExamines the case "Smith v SoS Environment" ([2003] EWCA Civ 262) which concerned a proposed development at a quarry and the issue of environmental impact. Planning permission to vary two conditions of existing permission was granted by the inspector subject to conditions which required the local planning authority (LPA) to approve schemes for landscaping and dust suppression. An appeal by S failed on the issue of the construction of the conditions but the judge made several important observations on how LPAs deal with proposed developments. He emphasised that fuller debate is needed on who should determine matters reserved by an inspector and that it is wrong to try to bind an LPA to act reasonably when it is not party to the undertaking.
590			_aABS
650			_aSMITH V SOS ENVIRONMENT
650			_aENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENTS
650			_aQUARRIES
650			_aRESERVED MATTERS
650			_aLOCAL PLANNING AUTHORITIES
650			_aPLANNING CONDITIONS
690			_aPlanning and development _96259
700			_aMartin, J.
942			_n0
999			_c72502 _d72502