000			01421cam a2200265 4500
001			ABS66615
008			030428n2003 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u122095
100			_aMurdoch, S.
245			_aNotice this similarity?
260			_c2003
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(0310) 8 March 2003, 162(1)
520			_aIn "Trafford MBC v Total Fitness (UK) Ltd" ([2002] EWCA Civ 1513, [2003] 2 P&CR 8-23(17) the CA held that when deciding whether a notice is valid the reasonable recipient test as laid down in "Mannai Investment Co Ltd v Eagle Star Life Assurance Co UK" (HL Abs57166) must first be applied to decide what the notice means. Only if, as a result of that process, an ambiguity or defect remains, does it become necessary to consider whether the notice complies with any mandatory, statutory or contractual requirements. The notice in this instance was found to be valid (see also WB3808-23, WB3809-23, WB3810-19 and WB3811-24).
590			_aABS
650			_aMANNAI INVESTMENT CO LTD V EAGLE STAR LIFE ASSURANCE CO LTD UK
650			_aTRAFFORD MBC V TOTAL FITNESS (UK) LTD
650			_aNOTICES
650			_aBREAK NOTICES
650			_aCOMMERCIAL LEASES
650			_aBREAK CLAUSES
650			_aSPEEDWELL ESTATES LTD AND ANOTHER V DALZIEL AND OTHERS
650			_aBURMAN V MOUNT COOK LAND LTD
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-BUSINESS TENANCIES-CASE LAW
942			_n0
999			_c72551 _d72551