000			01542cam a2200253 4500
001			X122098
008			030428n2003 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u122098
245			_aSage v SoS Environment and others
260			_c2003
490			_aWeekly Law Reports _v[2003] 1 WLR 983-994(12)
520			_a[2003] UKHL 22, 10 April 2003. Appeal by the local planning authority (Maidstone BC) from the CA decision ([2001] EWCA Civ 100, [2002] 1 P&CR 493) that an enforcement notice served on the respondent's partially erected dwelling house had expired. The issue was the whether the enforcement notice was served within the four-year time limit imposed in relation to the completion of building operations under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 s171B. "Held": appeal allowed. The inspector was correct in concluding that since the building had not been 'substantially completed' the enforcement notice had been served within the four-year time limit. View judgment at www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk.
590			_aABS
650			_aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 S171(B)
650			_aSUBSTANTIALLY COMPLETED
650			_aENFORCEMENT NOTICES
650			_aTIME LIMITS
650			_aPLANNING CONTROL
650			_aSAGE V SOS ENVIRONMENT AND OTHERS
650			_aBUILDING OPERATIONS
690			_aPlanning and development _96259
856			_uhttps://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/ld200203/ldjudgmt/jd030410/sage-1.htm _zView judgment on the UK Parliament website...
942			_n0
999			_c72552 _d72552