000			01515cab a2200205 4500
001			ABS38589
008			090401t1987 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u11390
041			_aeng
245			_aAshburn Anstalt v Arnold and another
260			_c1987
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette _v284(6363) 5 December 1987, 1375-1386(8)
520			_aCA 27 October 1987. The defendant (A) received the headlease of 3 properties in July 1969, one of which he later transfered to `A & Co`, under what the judge described as an informal sublease. In 1973 Cavendish Land Co Ltd acquired the freehold . In February 1973 A and A & Co entered into agreements with Matlock Ltd for the sale of the headlease and sublease on the basis that they were at liberty to remain in the property without paying rent. The benefit of the 2 agreements were assigned by Matlock to Cavendish. In 1979 Cavendish transferred the freehold to Legal and General who transfered it to the plaintiffs (X) on 11 October 1985. Legal and General wrote to A and A & Co before the transfer telling them who to pay future rent to although no rent was in fact payable. On 21 October 1985 X`s solicitors wrote to A and A & Co saying they required vacant possession of the property and that all agreements that existed between A and A & Co and Legal and General were at an end giving them 7
650			_aLEASES
650			_aLICENCES
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-BUSINESS TENANCIES
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c7256 _d7256