000			01310cam a2200229 4500
001			ABS66616
008			030429n2003 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u122135
245			_aZarvos v Pradhan and another
260			_c2003
490			_aEstates Gazette _v[2003] 26 EG 180-186(7)
520			_a[2003] EWCA Civ 208, 2003. Appeal by the landlord (Z) from a decision that he was not entitled to oppose the grant of a new business tenancy to the respondent tenants (P) under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 s30(1)(g). Z's grounds for opposing the application were that he intended to occupy the premises for carrying out his own restaurant business. Z appealed that it was not clear whether the judge had held that he had no genuine intention or whether he had a genuine intention but could not carry it out. "Held", the appeal was dismissed. View judgment at www.bailii.org.
590			_aABS
650			_aZARVOS V PRADHAN
650			_aBUSINESS TENANCIES
650			_aTERMINATION
650			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1954 S30(1)(G)
650			_aINTENTION TO OCCUPY
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-BUSINESS TENANCIES-CASE LAW
856			_uhttps://www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/markup.cgi?doc=/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2003/208.html&query=Zarvos _zView judgment on BAILII website.
942			_n0
999			_c72581 _d72581