000			01519cam a2200253 4500
001			ABS66634
008			030430n2002 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u122152
100			_aHarper, K.
245			_aCommon access
260			_c2002
490			_aSolicitors' Journal _v146(46) 6 December 2002, 1099-1100(2)
520			_aDiscusses the implications of the case "Massey v Boulden" ([2002] EWCA Civ 1634 Abs66173) for those with rights of access under prescription. The claimants could not acquire a prescriptive vehicular right of way on a track across a village green owned by the defendants as it contravened the Road Traffic Act 1988 s34(1)(a) and (b). The main implication of this case is, if these prescribed rights of way are to continue, landlords can demand payment under the Countryside and Rights of Way Act 2000. The Vehicular Access Across Common and Other Land Regulations 2002 set out the details of costs and procedure but applications need to made as soon as possible as the Regulations require applications within 12 months of 3 July 2002 or the date on which the use of the right of way ceases.
590			_aABS
650			_aRIGHTS OF WAY
650			_aPRESCRIPTIVE RIGHTS
650			_aMASSEY AND ANOTHER V BOULDEN AND ANOTHER
650			_aCOUNTRYSIDE AND RIGHTS OF WAY ACT 2000
650			_aVEHICULAR ACCESS ACROSS COMMON AND OTHER LAND (ENGLAND) REGULATIONS 2002
650			_aVILLAGE GREENS
650			_aROAD TRAFFIC ACT 1988
690			_aPROPERTY
942			_n0
999			_c72594 _d72594