000			01693cam a2200301 4500
001			ABS66728
008			030507n2003 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u122199
100			_aPugh-Smith, J.
245			_aRecent developments in planning law
260			_c2003
490			_aJournal of Planning and Environment Law _vMay 2003, 526-536(11)
520			_aReviews the key planning issues considered by the courts over the last 12 months. Describes how third-party challenges have become the biggest source of planning case law, with reference to the HL decision in "R v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC ex p Burkett" ([2002] UKHL 23; Abs66375). Examines case law covering the more specific issues of new material considerations, delegated powers, the meaning and size of a 'household', human rights considerations, plan-making jurisprudence and lawful development rights. Also discusses legitimate expectation, estoppel and enforcement of procedure with reference to the other major HL decision, "R v East Sussex CC ex p Reprotech (Pebsham) Ltd and another" ([2002] UKHL 8; WB3810-22). Concludes with speculation about the impact of planning reform upon third-party challenges. Case law.
590			_aABS
650			_aTHIRD PARTY APPEALS
650			_aMATERIAL CONSIDERATIONS
650			_aDELEGATION
650			_aHOUSEHOLDS
650			_aPLANNING POLICY
650			_aESTOPPEL
650			_aDEVELOPMENT RIGHTS
650			_aTHIRD PARTY RIGHTS
650			_aHUMAN RIGHTS
650			_aR V EAST SUSSEX CC EX P REPROTECH (PEBSHAM) LTD AND ANOTHER
650			_aR V HAMMERSMITH AND FULHAM LBC EX P BURKETT
690			_aPlanning and development _96259
942			_n0
999			_c72627 _d72627