| 000 | 01154cam a2200241 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | X122344 | ||
| 008 | 030520n2003 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u122344 | ||
| 100 | _aPaton, E. | ||
| 245 | _aCan't get there from here? - Permissible use of easements after Das | ||
| 260 | _c2003 | ||
| 490 |
_aConveyancer and Property Lawyer _vMarch-April 2003, 127-135(9) |
||
| 520 | _aDiscusses the law of easements in the light of "Das v Linden Mews Ltd" ([2002] EWCA Civ 590; Abs65693) which reinstated the "Harris v Flower" ([1904] 74 L J Ch 127, 132) rule. Traces the evolution of the rule and considers whether its use can be justified. The Law Commission is considering a review of the law of easements but this is not likely to take place until late 2004, not 2003 as implied in the article. For latest position see www.lawcom.gov.uk. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aDAS AND OTHERS V LINDEN MEWS | ||
| 650 | _aEASEMENTS | ||
| 650 | _aHARRIS V FLOWER | ||
| 650 | _aACCESS | ||
| 650 | _aRIGHT OF WAY | ||
| 690 |
_aBoundary disputes _96221 |
||
| 856 |
_uhttps://www.lawcom.gov.uk _zView the Law Commission website... |
||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c72706 _d72706 |
||