000 01059cam a2200241 4500
001 ABS66720
008 030522n2003 000 0 eng u
035 _a(Sirsi) u122368
100 _aMurdoch, S.
245 _aPie in sky for restaurateur
260 _c2003
490 _aEstates Gazette
_v(0318) 3 May 2003, 112(1)
520 _aDiscusses the case "Zarvos v Pradhan" ([2003] EWCA Civ 2008; Abs66616) in which the appellant landlord opposed renewal of the tenant's lease, as he intended to use the premises for his own business. The CA refused to interfere with the trial judge's finding that the appellant landlord had not provided the proof of necessary intention under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 Part II.
590 _aABS
650 _aZARVOS V PRADHAN
650 _aLANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1954 PART II
650 _aLANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1954 S30(1)(G)
650 _aTENANCY RENEWAL
650 _aBUSINESS TENANCIES
650 _aINTENTION TO OCCUPY
690 _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-BUSINESS TENANCIES-CASE LAW
942 _n0
999 _c72725
_d72725