000			02040cam a2200313 4500
001			ABS66687
008			030527n2003 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u122416
100			_aShelbourne, C.
245			_aPublic development projects and the historic built environment: comparing the English and Amercian approach
260			_c2003
490			_aJournal of Planning and Environment Law _vJune 2003, 678-689(12)
520			_aExamines the provisions governing public development projects affecting the historic built environment in England and the United States. Explains that there are no statutory limitations on government projects within the development control process in England; instead governments rely on DoE Circular 18/84, "Crown land and crown development". Outlines the requirements of DoE Circular 18/84 and describes how it applies to the specialist controls over the historic built environment. Notes that major infrastructure projects are an exception to the general rules and looks at the SoS's power to make Works Orders under the Transport and Works Act 1992. In the United States the situation is very different with government development proposals subjected to tight statutory controls. Explains the requirements of the National Heritage Preservation Act 1966 s106 in detail and concludes that the US system is superior as it provides a comprehensive review of the likely impact of the project on the historic environment and is integrated into the planning process. Case law.
590			_aABS
650			_aUNITED STATES
650			_aTRANSPORT AND WORKS ACT 1992
650			_aCONSERVATION
650			_aDOE CIRCULAR 18/1984
650			_aCROWN IMMUNITY
650			_aNATIONAL HERITAGE PRESERVATION ACT 1966 S106
650			_aPUBLIC DEVELOPMENT
650			_aDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS
650			_aINFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS
650			_aHISTORIC ENVIRONMENT
650			_aBUILT ENVIRONMENT
650			_aLISTED BUILDINGS
690			_aPROPERTY-PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT
942			_n0
999			_c72765 _d72765