| 000 | 01514cam a2200289 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS66834 | ||
| 008 | 030604n2002 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u122512 | ||
| 100 | _aEdwards, M. | ||
| 245 | _aNo time to waiver | ||
| 260 | _c2002 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(0250) 14 December 2002, 110(1) |
||
| 520 | _aExamines the implications of the final case of 2002 that finalised the legal move towards the planning system and the need for public law principles to be fully respected. In "Henry Boot Homes Ltd v Bassetlaw DC" [2002] EWCA Civ 98, the developer was found to be in breach of conditions precedent and therefore the development was not a valid commencement. The court ruled that the outline planning permission was no longer extant. Recognises that legislation allows for third parties and the public generally to have a say in any planning decision entered on the planning register and that the scope for varying conditions by non-statutory means must be limited. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aPLANNING PROCESS | ||
| 650 | _aPUBLIC LAW | ||
| 650 | _aHENRY BOOT HOMES LTD V BASSETLAW DC | ||
| 650 | _aPLANNING PERMISSION | ||
| 650 | _aCONDITIONS PRECEDENT | ||
| 650 | _aDEVELOPMENT | ||
| 650 | _aPIONEER AGGREGATES (UK) LTD V SOS ENVIRONMENT & ORS | ||
| 650 | _aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 S73 | ||
| 650 | _aR V EAST SUSSEX CC EX P REPROTECH (PEBSHAM) LTD AND ANOTHER | ||
| 690 |
_aPlanning and development _96259 |
||
| 700 | _aMartin, J. | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c72814 _d72814 |
||