000			01828cam a2200277 4500
001			ABS66831
008			030613n2003 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u122590
245			_aSouth Bucks DC v Porter; Wrexham CBC v Berry; Chichester DC v Searle and others
260			_c2003
490			_aWeekly Law Reports _v[2003] 2 WLR 1547-1585(39)
520			_a[2003] UKHL 26, 22 May 2003. Appeals in three cases by local planning authorities challenging the guidance on the grant of injunctions under the Town Country Planning Act 1990 s187b ([2001] EWCA Civ 1549, Abs65647). The respondents were gypsies living on land without planning permission and in each case the local authorities were granted injunctions to restrain a breach of planning control. The gypsies appealed and won on the grounds that the judge had failed to consider the issue of proportionality and was in breach of the Human Rights Act 1998 s6(1). Held: appeals dismissed. The jurisdiction to grant an injunction under s187b was an original, not a supervisory injunction and the decision to grant an injunction was not proportionate because it failed to consider any personal hardship which would result. View judgment at www.parliament.the-stationary-office.co.uk.
590			_aABS
650			_aGYPSIES
650			_aINJUNCTION
650			_aBREACH OF PLANNING CONTROL
650			_aPROPORTIONALITY
650			_aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 S187(B)
650			_aHUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1998 S6(1)
650			_aWREXHAM BC V BERRY
650			_aSOUTH BUCKS DC V PORTER
650			_aCHICHESTER DC V SEARLE AND OTHERS
690			_aPlanning and development _96259
856			_uhttps://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/ld200203/ldjudgmt/jd030522/wrex-1.htm _zView judgment on the UK Parliament website...
942			_n0
999			_c72850 _d72850