000			01422cam a2200241 4500
001			ABS66845
008			030625n2003 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u122733
245			_aDelay any move towards legislative enactment
260			_c2003
490			_aResidential Renting _v(22) May 2003, 28-32 (5)
520			_aDiscusses York University's independent evaluation of the two-year pilot tenancy deposit scheme (TDS) with custodial and insured options, which was launched in March 2000. The full evaluation is the only place in which the pros and cons of a TDS solution are fully discussed and it concludes that a mandatory TDS regulating the entire sector would be something as yet unknown in the sector, therefore advises delay in legislative enactment to allow the full testing of the pilot over a two-year period. Summarises the views of Shelter and the Independent Housing Ombudsman in favour of a single mandatory TDS and adjudication body as well as the National Federation of Residential Landlords (NFRL).
590			_aABS
650			_aTENANCY DEPOSIT SCHEME (TDS)
650			_aLANDLORDS
650			_aDEPOSITS
650			_aPROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT-RESIDENTIAL TENANCIES
650			_aDISPUTE RESOLUTION _96236
650			_aTENANTS
650			_aINDEPENDENT HOUSING OMBUDSMAN
690			_aPROPERTY MANAGEMENT-RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY
942			_n0
999			_c72916 _d72916