000			01173cam a2200181 4500
001			ABS66828
008			030627n2003 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u122795
245			_aPlease do not disturb
260			_c2003
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(0325) 21 June 2003, 140(1)
520			_aConsiders "Marazzi and another v Global Grange Ltd" ([2003] EWHC 3010 (Ch), Abs...) which illustrates the point that appeal courts rarely interfere with a decision which requires the exercise of a discretion or the evaluation of evidence even where it might have reached a different conclusion. It is generally accepted that a trial judge's view of whether a landlord's proposed works satisfy s30(1)(f) should not normally be disturbed. The HC upheld the county court decision that the proposed transformation from a two star to a luxury four-star hotel did not fulfil the requirements of s30(1)(f) as no demolition or reconstruction of the premises as required.
590			_aABS
650			_aMARAZZI AND ANOTHER V GLOBAL GRANGE LTD
650			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1954 S30(1)(F)
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-BUSINESS TENANCIES-CASE LAW
942			_n0
999			_c72947 _d72947