| 000 | 01655cam a2200241 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS66842 | ||
| 008 | 030701n2003 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u122846 | ||
| 245 | _aAston Cantlow and Wilmcote with Billesley PCC v Wallbank and another | ||
| 260 | _c2003 | ||
| 490 |
_aWeekly Law Reports _v[2003] 3 WLR 283-336(54) |
||
| 520 | _a[2003] UKHL 37, 26 June 2003 Appellant PCC appealed against CA decision ([2001] EWCA Civ 713, Abs64829) which held that enforcing liability of a lay rector for chancel repair was contrary to the European Convention on Human Rights. The respondent (W) were owners of Glebe Farm. Part of the farm was rectorial property. The owners were therefore lay rectors and were therefore liable for paying for all repairs to the chancel of the local parish church. The appellant PCC served notices on W requiring them to put the chancel in property repair under the Chancel Repairs Act 1932. HL held that enforcing a lay rector's responsibility did not infringe W's rights under the Convention. Appeal dismissed. View judgment at www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aASTON CANTLOW AND WILMCOTE WITH BILLESLEY PCC V WALLBANK AND ANOTHER | ||
| 650 | _aCONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND FUNDAMENTAL FREEDOMS | ||
| 650 | _aHUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1998 | ||
| 650 | _aREPAIRING LIABILITY | ||
| 650 | _aTAX | ||
| 650 | _aCHANCEL REPAIR LIABILITY | ||
| 690 | _aPROPERTY AND LAND LAW-CASE LAW | ||
| 856 |
_uhttps://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/ld200203/ldjudgmt/jd030626/aston-1.htm _zView judgment on the UK Parliament website... |
||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c72971 _d72971 |
||