| 000 | 01351cam a2200217 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS66801 | ||
| 008 | 030702n2003 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u122859 | ||
| 100 | _aBingham, T. | ||
| 245 | _aEasy steps to hair loss | ||
| 260 | _c2003 | ||
| 490 |
_aBuilding _v268(2884) 30 May 2003, 50-51(2) |
||
| 520 | _aExamines the need for there to be a dispute before adjudication becomes a possibility. Looks at "Beck Peppiatt Ltd v Norwest Holst Construction Ltd" ([2003] EWHC 822 (TCC), unreported). The case highlights the need to apply the facts to determine whether the discussion or negotiation between the parties has ended, leaving an issue to be decided. There is a need to canvass the position before an adjudication and this applies to both the referring or responding party. View judgment at www.bailli.org. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aBECK PEPPIATT LTD V NORWEST HOLST CONSTRUCTION LTD | ||
| 650 | _aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION | ||
| 650 | _aNEGOTIATION | ||
| 690 | _aMANGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION | ||
| 856 |
_uhttps://www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/markup.cgi?doc=/ew/cases/EWHC/TCC/2003/822.html _vView judgment on the BAILII website... |
||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c72980 _d72980 |
||